The phrase "any liability based on" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to refer to responsibility or obligation arising from a specific cause or condition.
Example: "The company shall not accept any liability based on the actions of third parties."
Alternatives: "any responsibility arising from" or "any obligation stemming from".
Tort scholars have long been obsessed with the dichotomy between strict liability and liability based on fault or wrongdoing.
Experts generally say the law protects large internet platforms like Twitter, Facebook and YouTube from liability based on what their users publish.
The causes of action asserted in the complaint were public nuisance, strict liability based on failure to warn and design defect, private nuisance, negligence, and trespass.
But, as ADS never claimed liability based on this section in the Complaint or briefing, that argument was waived and was not fairly presented.
While this may be true, we have long held that the imposition of civil liability based on protected expression constitutes "punishment" of speech for First Amendment purposes.
Large institutional plaintiffs like some of Enron's lenders, which are also potential defendants in suits by Enron shareholders, want to be able to reduce their liability based on Andersen's share of responsibility for Enron's collapse.
Among other things, the defendants asserted that the special committee members were exculpated from liability based on Orchard having an exculpatory charter provision under Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL.
Contrary to the claim of Maimonides Medical Center (hereinafter the Hospital), the plaintiffs' counsel did not argue, during the second day of his summation, an entirely novel theory of liability, based on delay.
The Court determined that while the legislative history did not specifically address whether Congress intended to permit vicarious liability for the torts of municipal agents and employees, the same constitutional difficulties that Congress perceived when it rejected the Sherman amendment would apply to liability based on respondeat superior.
This information is critical because to establish a threat of director liability based on a disclosure violation, plaintiffs must plead facts that show that the violation was made knowingly or in bad faith, a showing that requires allegations regarding what the directors knew and when.
Other individuals who sign the registration statement, directors of the issuer, and the underwriter of the securities similarly are accorded a complete defense against civil liability based on the exercise of reasonable investigation and a reasonable belief that the registration statement was not misleading.
