The phrase "any interpretation that" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the various ways something can be understood or analyzed.
Example: "Any interpretation that deviates from the original text may lead to misunderstandings."
Alternatives: "any understanding that" or "any reading that".
"There was a lot of blood, and I think in any interpretation that was a frenzied attack," he said.
Thus, any interpretation that differed from the official one was necessarily "heretical" in the new, pejorative sense of the word.
The defined relation is simply the abstract structure, or as Hilbert puts it the "scaffolding," shared by any interpretation that will render the axioms true.
For example, any interpretation that makes '∃x Unicorn(x)' true will have some entity in its domain also be in the extension of 'Unicorn'.
It would be unfortunate if, perhaps out of an overdeveloped regard for history, one felt obliged to reject any interpretation that did not obey the letter of Kolmogorov's laws and that was thus 'inadmissible'inadmissible
Then an argument from set S of sentences to conclusion A is valid iff any interpretation that actually verifies S actually verifies A. (Here, a set S of sentences is actually verified just if all of its members are actually verified).
This distinction is important, because systems of logic turn out to have certain properties quite independently of any interpretations that may be placed upon them.
If you believe in what you're doing and you want to express yourself, the expression should be primary and any interpretations that come after must always remain of secondary importance to the creation of the work itself.
She also has a bad habit of forcing an interpretation that any intelligent reader is perfectly capable of picking up on her own: "Marjorie reached for the stone at her neck.
Any discrepancy in interpretation that deviates substantially from a consensus of one's peers is a reasonable and commonly accepted definition of interpretive radiological error [1], but even this is a loose description of a complex process, and may be subject to debate in individual circumstances.
Roberts considered it his duty to base his ruling not on the "most natural interpretation of the law" (his words) but on any "fairly possible" interpretation that would " save the statute from unconstitutionality". "It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices," Roberts reasoned.
