Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
The size of the Wikipedia crowd, with multiple people typically examining any given article, ensures a thorough monitoring of content quality.
Some publications, like Slate, tell readers how long it will take to read any given article, so that readers can decide whether it's worth it.
The results, which give articles a "churn rating", show the percentage of any given article that has been reproduced from publicity material.
I believed that the means of producing any given article was becoming more important than the article itself, and I don't think I was wrong about that.
Its main features are to: (i) provide incentives for making research communities to participate, (ii) make papers executable by means of boards' annotations, without necessarily involving the authors of an article, and (iii) give snapshots of the current research state on any given article.
They're totally optional for publishers, and the service will also cap the number of links in any given article at four.
Similar(47)
Limit the number of times per day any given user can post on a given article.
To start small, identify the basic propositions you want to defend in a given article.
Another useful feature is citation tracing; you can see which other articles (and how many) have cited a given article.
Eligible authors are corresponding authors of a given article who meet the funding criteria of the TU Wien.
Basic tools for exploring references, managing citations, and finding content related to a given article.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com