Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
We identified 1,114 persons at risk and offered antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Antimicrobial prophylaxis did not prevent wound infection.
Appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) prevents surgical site infections (SSI).
Preventative strategies are directed at minimizing the risk of SBP through the use of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Conclusion: Antimicrobial prophylaxis does not seem to reduce morbidity after removal of lower third molars.
The guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are based on results from well-designed studies, whenever possible.
Everitt DE, Soumerai SB, Avorn J, Klapholz H, Wessels M. Changing surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practices through education targeted at senior department leaders.
Aim: To test the efficacy of two dosing regimens of antimicrobial prophylaxis during the removal of impacted lower third molars.
Antimicrobial prophylaxis should be considered to prevent disseminated mycobacterial infection in these patients.
Selected oncologic population may be becoming eligible for antimicrobial prophylaxis against Pneumocystis or Aspergillus.
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis has a benefit in the prevention of BP-ONJ development.
More suggestions(15)
antimicrobial decision
antimicrobial medication
antimicrobial products
antimicrobial effects
antimicrobial mechanisms
antimicrobial finishes
antimicrobial materials
antimicrobial drugs
antimicrobial properties
antimicrobial mouthrinses
antimicrobial medicines
antimicrobial wipes
antimicrobial tests
antimicrobial peptides
use prophylaxis
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com