The phrase "anticipated value of the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing expected outcomes, projections, or estimations related to a specific subject or item.
Example: "The anticipated value of the investment is projected to increase significantly over the next five years."
Alternatives: "expected value of the" or "projected value of the".
We consider the motivation behind the study and the anticipated value of the study by key stakeholders.
This would allow research participants to make an autonomous decision on whether they think the anticipated value of the intervention is worth entering a trial.
The EVSI is the anticipated value of the health gain (or the expected net benefit of sample information ('Expected Net Gain', ENG)) over the period of t years, the chosen time horizon used for the analysis.
Miller generally advances the argument that the risk-benefit analysis therefore need not always be favourable to the individual patient, stating that 'clinical trials routinely administer interventions whose risks to patients are not compensated by medical benefits but are justified by the anticipated value of the scientific knowledge that might be gained'.
This paper aims to explore the policy context and narrative in the lead up to commissioning the Indigenous BoD (IBoD) study, focusing on relevant contextual factors and insights regarding the perspectives of key stakeholders and their anticipated value of the study.
The strategy of slopes exploits the maximal sensitivity of a titration performed with concentrations of the reagent in excess (the lipid) varied around the anticipated value(s) of the dissociation constant Kds.
It could be if the price of the stock is above our anticipated full value of the company.
However, as such data are anticipated, the value of the dataset presented here is expected to increase.
An advantage of this method is that researchers are forced to explain precisely what the anticipated social value of the intervention would be; to which problem it is a solution, and how it should be used.
Including 120 patients yields at least 80% to demonstrate that inter-observer agreement is substantial (Kappa >= 0.61), using a 0.05 significance level in one-sided testing, while expecting a 40% prevalence of levator defects and anticipating a value of the kappa statistic of 0.78 or better.
To confirm this we analysed data from a set of ATH-121501 GeneChips (for Arabidopsis thaliania): as anticipated the average value of the correlation coefficient between probes with four Gs at their free ends was very high (0.86).
