Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The combination of the DERS and the concentric rings structure we proposed is plotted in Figure 1b which contains several periodic gold rings and has the dipole antenna of the same size as the DERS structure.
Similar(59)
(A3) Channels related to different antennas of the same FBS are i.i.d.i.d
These include differences in the design of the antennas, manufacturing variability between antennas of the same model, the material which surrounds the antenna (including the antenna mount and radome), and the frequency range over which the antenna is used.
The system-level measurements verify the previous results, yielding a significant difference in the PER for the two orthogonal receiving antennas of the same link.
In other experimental studies that consider path loss modeling for directional antenna systems [35, 36], the authors compute different PLEs for different areas of the cell that consist of different terrains (but not different PLEs for different directional antennas of the same base station).
(h_{r,q}^{c}(t)) is the response of the SI channel from transmitting antenna q to receiving antenna r of the same transceiver.
(h_{r,q}^{s}(t)) is the response of the intended channel from transmitting antenna q of the other intended transceiver to receiving antenna r of the same transceiver.
The mean transmission power from different FBSs is not the same due to locations in separate apartments but antenna correlations of the same FBS may occur in practice.
We consider here two limit cases: (1) The high SNR case, where σ v 2 ≪ σ T 2 and (2) the case of high-dimensional system (the number of transmit antennae is of the same order of magnitude as the number of receiver antennae), where c2−1≪1.
The featherlike (plumose) antennae of some male moths, compared with the slender antennae of females of the same species, provide a high degree of surface area and thus a high degree of sensitivity.
The center of the tag and the center of the antenna are the same height.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com