Sentence examples for antecedent question from inspiring English sources
To the eternal question of how women are to be disposed of as both objects and agents, Kate Chopin offers an antecedent question: why is there a problem?
(a) The question whether a warrantless search of a home is reasonable and hence constitutional must be answered no in most instances, but the antecedent question whether a Fourth Amendment search has occurred is not so simple.
While some of the above cases must be acknowledged to have diluted the absolute purity of the rule that Article III jurisdiction is always an antecedent question, none of them even approaches approval of a doctrine of hypothetical jurisdiction that enables a court to resolve contested questions of law when its jurisdiction is in doubt.
While Rosenberger was concerned with the rights a student has to use an extracurricular speech program already in place, todays case considers the antecedent question, acknowledged but unresolved in Rosenberger: whether a public university may require its students to pay a fee which creates the mechanism for the extracurricular speech in the first instance.
Neither citizenship nor location is relevant to that clause, which, unhappily, never addresses the antecedent question of when habeas corpus is available in the first place.
Before this question can be addressed, however, two antecedent questions require clarification; at what stage of AD might 25% Aβ reduction produce efficacy, and what form of Aβ should be targeted for 25% reduction.
Determining whether the usual care interventions in pragmatic ceRCTs that compare one or more usual care interventions constitute clinical practice or research is therefore antecedent to questions pertaining to research ethics review, analysis of study benefits and harms, and the content of informed consent procedures.
There may, for instance, be a complementary grouping of phrases as antecedent and consequent or "question and answer". The phrases may or may not be equal in length.
But the antecedent choice-of-law question is a federal one where the rule at issue itself derives from federal law, constitutional or otherwise.
If the antecedent is false, the question lapses: there is no conditional belief for him to express.
Perhaps Wittgenstein simply did not have an antecedent opinion on the question whether Tractarian names will turn out to be names of particulars only, particulars and universals, or whatnot.
