answer was reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "answer was reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that a response has been examined or assessed, often in contexts like feedback or evaluations. Example: "After the meeting, the answer was reviewed by the committee to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

As each answer was reviewed one by one, any corrections to the answers were typed in during the interview and checked with the interviewees.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Firstly, each answer was reviewed line by line by two authors independently and coded according to the main subject categories.

Global Health Action

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The GPs' answers were reviewed by two independent reviewers.

BMC Family Practice

Results of Likert-scaled questions were tabulated and free text answers were reviewed for recurring topics by two reviewers independently.

BMC Medical Education

Her answers are reviewed by the clinic's medical staff before she publishes them.

The New York Times

Answers were reviewed, and the level of agreement was characterized as follows: Level 1: ≥75% agreement; Level 2 51%-74% agreement; and Level 3: ≤50% agreement.

Stanford University

Instead of filling out complex applications, users are guided step by step through a series of questions, and their answers are reviewed by an immigration lawyer before being sent in.

The New York Times - Tech

Answers were reviewed.

Critical Care

At the end of the session, all of the answers were reviewed with the house-staff.

F1000Research

Answers were reviewed onsite, and a 5-mL blood sample was collected.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

All consent forms were filed at the study site and all questionnaire answers were reviewed and coded for data entry.

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase "answer was reviewed" when you want to indicate that a response has been formally examined or assessed, typically for accuracy or completeness.

Common error

While grammatically correct, excessive use of the passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to the active voice (e.g., "The committee reviewed the answer") for a more direct and engaging tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "answer was reviewed" functions as a statement indicating that a response has been examined. Ludwig AI confirms this is correct and usable in written English. It often appears in contexts where responses are being formally assessed.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

25%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "answer was reviewed" is a grammatically sound and usable expression indicating that a response has undergone examination or assessment. As Ludwig AI highlights, it serves to convey that a formal evaluation has occurred, ensuring accuracy or completeness. Though not overly common, the phrase finds application across neutral to formal contexts, particularly in science, news, and academic writing. To enhance writing, consider using the active voice for a more direct tone, and be mindful of alternative expressions for varied emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

response was assessed

Switches from "answer" to "response" and "reviewed" to "assessed", providing a slightly more formal tone.

reply was checked

Replaces "answer" with "reply" and "reviewed" with "checked", making it sound more informal.

feedback was evaluated

Substitutes "answer" with "feedback", focusing on the evaluative aspect of the review.

the response underwent review

This alternative rephrases the sentence to emphasize the process of reviewing, making it more formal.

the reply was scrutinized

Replaces "reviewed" with "scrutinized", indicating a more detailed and critical examination.

the solution was analyzed

Changes the focus to "solution" and uses "analyzed" to highlight a deeper understanding was sought.

the submission was inspected

Uses "submission" instead of "answer" and "inspected" to suggest a careful, detailed examination.

the information was verified

Shifts the focus to "information" and uses "verified" to emphasize the confirmation of accuracy.

the explanation was considered

Focuses on the "explanation" aspect and uses "considered" to suggest a thoughtful evaluation.

the input was examined

Uses "input" instead of "answer" and "examined" to imply a careful and thorough review.

FAQs

How can I use "answer was reviewed" in a sentence?

You can use "answer was reviewed" to indicate that a response has been examined. For example: "After the meeting, the "answer was reviewed" by the committee to ensure accuracy."

What are some alternatives to "answer was reviewed"?

You can use alternatives like "response was assessed", "reply was checked", or "feedback was evaluated" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "answer was reviewed"?

While "answer was reviewed" is grammatically correct, using the active voice, such as "the reviewer reviewed the answer", can make your writing more direct and concise.

What does it mean when someone says my "answer was reviewed"?

It generally means that your response to a question or inquiry has been examined, typically to assess its accuracy, completeness, or suitability for a particular purpose.