This suggests a beginning of an answer to the objections lodged against Anaxagoras' use of nous as a cause.
Saul then objects to this proposal by means of questions in [7a and b] and [8], and the servant gives information in reply in [9] and then, in answer to the implied objection in Saul's questions, makes an offer to give goods-&-services in [10], which will perhaps help them in the errand they have been sent on [11].
The argument developed in this article also offers an answer to the common objection that biomedical interventions have both positive and negative effects, that our brain and bodies are complex and interrelated systems so that for any intervention that seems to have a beneficial upshot, there will always be numerous negative and even harmful side effects.
According to MOTdc, one could answer to this objection as follows: The object called "the existent golden mountain" is ιx∀F xF ≡ G ⇒ F ∨ M ⇒ F ∨ E! ⇒ F).
Again, Coppola has a ready answer to this objection: the film has been 10 years in the making, and he feels too close to it to make any decisions himself.
(J.Cohen, forthcoming) The answer to this objection (if there is one) is too complex to deal with here.
The answer to this objection is that convergence of preferences is indeed needed, but about a division of tasks and powers in an integrated multilevel polity rather than about a single unit of decision-making.
John Stuart Mill's answer to this objection consists, on the one hand, in an argument for the compatibility between utilitarianism and the protection of liberty rights and, on the other, in an instrumentalist defense of democratic political authority based on the principle of utility.
The Bush doctrine's answer to this objection is essentially this: Hey, we're the good guys.
The following sections will constitute an answer to the first two objections.
