Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The answer to items that were misinterpreted was not to discard, but to improve them, Mr. Sroufe said.
Most of the subjects gave the correct answer to items on basic health knowledge.
A 1993 survey conducted by the humanitarian aid organization CARE classified 70% of households, 77% of women, and 32% of children as hungry (defined as a positive answer to items using the Radimer/Cornell hunger scale) (17).
Similar(57)
Table 5 Detailed answer to item 2 in the questionnaires User group Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Total Group 1.a 0 5 2 2 1 10 Group 1.b 1 6 2 1 1 11 Group 2.a 1 7 4 1 0 13 Group 2.b 3 7 2 0 0 12 Total 5 25 10 4 2 46.
10 children felt that the answer to Item A14 depended on the sitting position and on the time spent sitting.
Two items were not locally independent, Item I6 ' Have you been troubled by pain from your joint in bed at night?' and Item I10 ' Has pain from your joint kept you awake during your night-time sleep?' as a positive answer to item I10 would imply a positive answer to item I6.
A sense of alarm will be considered as present when the answer to item 10 indicates a sense of alarm or when the answer to item 10 indicates that it is not applicable and at least one of the scores of items 2 5 is higher than 3/5.
A sense of alarm is considered as not present when the answer to item 10 indicates either a sense of reassurance or when the answer to item 10 indicates that it is not applicable and the score for item 1 is higher than 3/5.
This "no-skip" design also provided an excellent opportunity to assess the consistency of responses about tobacco-use behavior by comparing the answer to item 1 (Have you ever tried cigarette smoking, even 1 or 2 puffs?) with answers to comparable items (items 2, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40).
The answers to items 1 to 8 show a positive inclination.
Answers to items for previous mental health treatment, suicide attempts, family member attempted suicide and self-harm episodes were categorised as yes, no or missing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com