Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Answer to comment on abstract: We agree with the referee.
Moreover, linking myosin II to a support is rather non-physiological, as discussed in greater detail in the answer to comment 4.
Luckily, this problem is now solved by providing the interactive expasy website referred to in the answer to comment 3. Discussion section 10) Shortcomings - gel-based system, no receptors.
Answer to comment on the statement "… included in the sample … when detected using MR".: This statement was included to say that SM and MR scores were not the same.
For example, while 83% of services reported that they used 'CBT', some respondents annotated this answer to comment that they incorporated some CBT-based approaches on exploring beliefs and thinking patterns, but did not have a qualified CBT therapist on the clinical team.
In addition, in order to determine whether the Gal4DBD is still present on the template when a nucleosome is repositioned to the other side of the Gal4 binding site, the nucleosome must be located sufficiently far from the Gal4 binding site so that the footprint of the repositioned nucleosome does not overlap with the Gal4 binding site (see our answer to comment #2).
Similar(51)
These considerations were presented to the participants, who were asked to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed by marking one of the listed answers; to comment their answers in comment boxes; and to add more considerations.
Answer to comments on results: We accept the suggestion of the referee on abbreviations.
Answer to comments on Table 3: (1-5) and (6) are the combinations described in the Material and Methods.
Answer to comments on Figure 1: The fact that figures are not explained following their sequence was intentional.
Answer to comments on the aims: The evidences supporting SM as a gold standard for dentin reactions to caries are typically those cited in the review paper by Kidd & Fejerskov (2004) (reference 25); to quote: references 6, 8 and 9, and Johnson et al., 1969).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com