Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The number of patients with missing data (e.g., patients who did not answer the instruments to assess pain and disability at baseline and at discharge) was also identified.
Similar(59)
A prerequisite for validity is that minimum six students answer the instrument for one tutor [ 11].
Patients completed the BSIqol in a median time <2 min. Only one patient reported some difficulty to answer the instrument.
The file content refers to: (1) instructions to answer the instrument; (2) socio demographic and academic information; (3) 45 uncertainty situations that the residents may have experienced with 12 multiple choise options for each one.
All guardians (88.4% parents, 11.6% others) answered the instruments (n = 190) reporting on the quality of life of children.
Out of the 78 patients interviewed, only one (1/78; 1.3%) reported having some difficulty in answering the instrument.
Five of the six samples answered to the instruments personally (n = 280), and one sample participated in an online survey (n = 192).
If Q13 is not considered, only 0.7% of the sample has any missing value, which suggests that the questions are easy to answer, indicating the instrument's high feasibility.
Instruments for self-evaluation in Educational Centres (SEP, 2007) and the information in the answers from the instrument related to a Likert Scale were organised in order to make graphic representations (quantitative features).
In addition, ICC was used to measure agreement between answers to the instrument when applied in two different occasions, for temporal stability verification.
On the other hand, it is not clear how much patients pay attention to the respective reporting periods, particularly when answering the 3 instruments consecutively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com