Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Answer: in principle, they should not although in practice the issue is hotly disputed.
This problem, in one form or another, has preoccupied Dennett greatly, though he thinks he found the answer, in principle, as a very young man.
Wilkes thinks that "whenever we are examining the ranges of concepts that do not pick on natural kinds, the problem of deciding what is or what is not 'relevant' to the success of the thought experiment is yet more problematic than the same question as it arises in science; and, unlike the scientific problem, it may not even have an answer in principle".
Similar(55)
He tends to hold that every genuine question (that is, every question whose possible answers have empirical content) can be answered in principle, or at least should not be assumed to be unanswerable.
Needless to say, these basic questions were answered in principle by the mid-1960s; toanks thethe brilliant achievements of a rather small number of outstanding researchers.
To be able to detect these faulty thoughts, we included a second correct answer alternative ("In principle, the same thing is happening when the nozzle of an inflated balloon is opened, and the balloon is whizzing through the air").
The answer is: in principle, no; in practice, yes.
Questions of how brains compute behaviorally relevant stimulus features from sensory inputs are central to neuroscience, but they are extraordinarily difficult to answer, even in principle.
Facing new and complex problems, we find answers in principles that endure".
In fact, there is no puzzle here: economists and public policy scholars worked out decades ago how to answer this question in principle, and solved many of the issues in detail.
But in musical instruments—and, by implication, in nearly all manufactured artifact systems there is often no definitive answer possible even in principle to what is the "natural" classification of a group of artifacts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com