Sentence examples for answer highly from inspiring English sources

The laptops also make it possible for doctors to use sales reps as research associates: Genentech has a staff of medical specialists who can answer highly technical questions posed through an on-line question-and-answer template.

He makes the point that, in Germany, the media is much more focused on outing players than in Britain, and indeed some of the German game's biggest figures have had to answer highly inappropriate questions - based on little more than innuendo - about their sexuality.

Race was mentioned a few other times in the episode after the cold open, once in a talk show called "How's He Doing?" featuring Thompson, Pharoah and Washington as "nonpartisan" black intellectual talking heads addressing the likelihood that President Obama would ever lose their support (answer: highly unlikely).

When asked how relevant speaking to patients about alcohol would be in their intended medical practice, students intending a primary care specialty were significantly more likely to answer "highly relevant"; this was the case for all time points in school (P<0.01, table 4).

Regarding the percentages of respondents who answered, "highly annoyed," it was found that there were no systematic differences between the two verbal scales.

Answering highly prioritized research questions is not enough.

Regarding overall satisfaction related to the service received at the health centers, most of the women (98.6 %) answered "highly satisfied" or "satisfied".

Highly confident incorrect answers at the vertices and along the line between the two incorrect answers are highly penalized, while incorrect answers along the sides of the triangle connected to the correct answer are only marginally penalized, relative to the points received for answering the question correctly with high confidence.

What should I conclude but that the answer is highly embarrassing?

And there can scarcely be any doubt that the subject matter of Sessions's answer was highly material to the Senate's consideration of his nomination.

The answer — a highly qualified "yes, but" — has ramifications for scholars, publishers, museums, heirs and anyone else who has an interest in seeing and studying works of art in a global context.