Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
If the classification differed according to the replaced value, participants were considered as having a missing answer for the dimension.
Similar(59)
Text-based questions with open answer categories (e.g. "What would you answer Mister Fischer?" for the dimension of communication strategies) and with responses in multiple-choice format (e.g. "How would you deal with your emotions in this situation?" and then selecting one of four possible answers for the dimension of emotion regulation) were selected for the final version.
If the classification of participants was the same for any possible value of the missing item, participants were considered as having non-missing answers for the dimension of interest (38/88 participants with missing data).
The 26 patients that did not answer for the second time (after 2 years) had lower scores after 6 months in all 8 dimensions, significant for 3 dimensions and borderline significant for 2, when compared with the 100 included patients.
Questionnaires with one blank item in the pain and stiffness dimensions and between one and three blank items in the functional capacity dimension were corrected according to the procedure proposed by Bellamy et al, with missing data for the unanswered items being replaced by the mean value of items answered for each dimension [ 27].
There are five possible answers for each dimension, defining (5) 3125 possible health states.
After that, we discuss for each of the three dimensions separately how the indicators for the dimensions were measured.
Look for the Dimensions entry.
Responses were included for the screening-detected cases and referents when they had provided answers for all five dimensions and on the VAS at both baseline and follow-up (cases n = 103 and referents n = 483).
For each physician the Cognitive dimension was scored as the number of correct answers for the 70 items.
The participant is asked to choose from three answer levels for each dimension.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com