Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
answer for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "answer for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that someone is responsible for something or must explain their actions. Example: "He will have to answer for his mistakes during the meeting."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
explain
be happy about
function as
have a function
bear the responsibility for
be responsible for
answerable for
be held accountable for
became responsible for
further a role
provide care for
respond for
be reliable for
undertake responsibility
secure a role
play a part
occupying a role
have autonomy over
attest to
attend to
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Good answer, for a lawyer.
News & Media
There's no answer for toughness.
News & Media
Same answer for Stones.
News & Media
/ Answer for me.
News & Media
There's no right answer for anyone.
News & Media
You can judge his answer for yourself.
News & Media
Value-engineering has much to answer for.
News & Media
I have a lot to answer for.
News & Media
Gould had an answer for that.
News & Media
"He has an answer for every objection.
News & Media
I have no answer for that.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "answer for" when you want to emphasize the responsibility or accountability someone has for their actions or the actions of others. It can also be used to vouch for someone's character or guarantee something.
Common error
Avoid using "answer" alone when you specifically mean to convey responsibility or being held accountable. "Answer" simply means to respond, while "answer for" implies a deeper level of obligation or consequence.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "answer for" functions primarily as a verb phrase indicating responsibility, accountability, or providing a guarantee. According to Ludwig AI, it often implies being held to account for actions or attesting to someone's character.
Frequent in
News & Media
96%
Formal & Business
2%
Science
1%
Less common in
Wiki
1%
Encyclopedias
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "answer for" is a versatile verb phrase commonly used to express responsibility, accountability, or the act of vouching for someone. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. It's predominantly found in News & Media sources. While "be responsible for" and "account for" are viable alternatives, the specific nuance of facing consequences or providing explanations is best conveyed by "answer for". To prevent misuse, ensure you're not simply using "answer" when the context requires the weight of responsibility implied by "answer for".
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be responsible for
Focuses directly on the aspect of accountability and duty.
be held accountable for
Emphasizes the potential consequences of actions.
take responsibility for
Highlights the act of accepting blame or obligation.
account for
Stresses the need to explain or justify something.
explain
Centers on providing clarification or reasons.
vouch for
Specifically relates to attesting to someone's character or reliability.
attest to
Formal way to confirm the truth or validity of something or someone.
guarantee
Focuses on assuring a specific outcome or condition.
be liable for
Indicates legal or financial obligation.
stand behind
Implies support and endorsement.
FAQs
How is "answer for" different from "account for"?
"Answer for" generally implies taking responsibility or blame, while "account for" often refers to explaining or providing reasons for something. While similar, "account for" focuses more on providing an explanation.
When should I use "be responsible for" instead of "answer for"?
You can use "be responsible for" when you want to highlight the duty or obligation someone has. "Answer for" can also imply facing consequences or providing explanations, so "be responsible for" is a more general term.
Can "answer for" be used in a positive context?
Yes, "answer for" can be used to vouch for someone or guarantee something, such as "I can "vouch for" his integrity" or "I will answer for his debt if he can't pay".
What's a formal alternative to "answer for"?
Formal alternatives include "be held accountable for" or "be liable for". These phrases are suitable for legal or professional contexts where a high degree of responsibility is emphasized. "Be held accountable for" is usually the best option.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested