An answer-by-answer recap of Mr. Cordray's 1987 appearances found on a Jeopardy archive site, along with a grainy video of one of those performances, seems to support the president's accolades.
Because Interrogatives stand in inferential relations to one another (Q1 entails Q2 just in case any answer to Q1 is an answer to Q2), one strategy for answering a question is to divide it into tractable questions that it entails: 'How many covered bridges are there in Japan?' can be answered by answering that question for each of that country's 47 prefectures.
Why was she worried about dividing immigrant families through deportation, he asked, when American families were being divided by murder-by-immigrants? His answer — his answer to almost any question involving Clinton — was that she was a criminal herself.
According to this conception, for any given subject during their waking hours the question 'What is currently appearing on the stage of your consciousness?' always has a fully precise answer, an answer determined by the experiential contents present in the relevant subject's consciousness.
Test takers complete multiple-choice questions by marking their answers on answer sheets.
While that tradition lives on, more often it seems that "answer records" have been replaced by answer drive-bys.
There can be no full, final, formulaic answer; suitable answers will vary by situation.
The fallacy known as begging the question in Latin petitio principii originally meant answering the "big" or principal question that an entire inquiry is supposed to answer by means of answers to several "small" questions.
For questions aiming the fixing and verification of the theory are used two of these forms: the single correct answer from multiple choices and answer by multiple-select options to achieve the correct answer.
Wittgenstein then clarifies this answer by reformulating the second question of (§5) as "Under what circumstances is a proposition asserted in Russell's game [i.e., system]?", which he then answers by saying: "the answer is: at the end of one of his proofs, or as a 'fundamental law' (Pp)." (§6).
