another defendant

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "another defendant" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an additional person who is being accused or involved in a legal case alongside others. Example: "The jury was presented with evidence against another defendant who was implicated in the same crime."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Another defendant, Port Vale defender Clayton McDonald, was cleared.

The Guardian

Another defendant is sobbing.

The New York Times

Another defendant is at large.

The New York Times

Another defendant was acquitted.

The New York Times

Another defendant knows he probably will not.

The Economist

Another defendant, Liggett, was excluded.

The New York Times

Another defendant, Michael Turano, pleaded guilty with Mr. Kruger.

The New York Times

Another defendant, Thomas Gambino, was released on $500,000 bail.

The New York Times

Another defendant, Kenneth Fetterman of Placerville, Calif., is at large.

The New York Times - Tech

Another defendant, Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, was acquitted.

The New York Times

A lawyer for another defendant took a different tack.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In legal documents or news reports, follow “another defendant” with the individual's name or a brief description to provide context and avoid confusion.

Common error

Avoid using vague pronouns like “he” or “she” after mentioning “another defendant”. Always clarify who you are referring to, especially when discussing complex legal scenarios with multiple individuals.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "another defendant" primarily functions as a noun phrase, specifying an additional individual involved in a legal proceeding. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase typically appears in legal contexts to differentiate individuals undergoing trial or investigation, as shown by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "another defendant" is a grammatically correct and frequently used term, particularly within legal and news contexts. As shown by Ludwig AI, it serves to identify additional individuals involved in a legal case, ensuring clarity and specificity in reporting. The term's neutral register makes it appropriate for professional and journalistic settings. When writing about legal matters, it's essential to use the phrase accurately to distinguish individuals and avoid ambiguity. Understanding these nuances will help ensure precise and effective communication in legal or related discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a co-defendant

Highlights the shared responsibility in the crime.

another accused party

Emphasizes the accusation against the individual.

a second defendant

Numerically identifies the defendant in relation to others.

an additional defendant

Focuses on the increase in the number of defendants.

another person on trial

Highlights the trial context.

a further defendant

Indicates the presence of more defendants in addition to the ones already mentioned.

a fellow defendant

Suggests a shared situation or experience among the defendants.

a second suspect

Shifts the focus to the suspicion surrounding the individual, similar to the legal context.

an accomplice

Emphasizes the involvement in the crime as an assistant to the primary offender.

an alleged conspirator

Highlights the accusation of conspiracy.

FAQs

How can I use "another defendant" in a sentence?

Use "another defendant" when referring to a person also accused in the same legal case. For example, "Another defendant was acquitted, while the primary suspect remained in custody."

What is a synonym for "another defendant"?

Synonyms include "co-defendant", "additional defendant", or "fellow defendant", though the best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "the other defendant" instead of "another defendant"?

While "the other defendant" isn't incorrect, "another defendant" is generally preferred when referring to one of several defendants. "The other defendant" implies there are only two defendants in total.

What's the difference between "another defendant" and "an accomplice"?

"Another defendant" simply indicates someone else accused in the same case. "An accomplice" implies someone assisted in the crime, which carries a different legal connotation.