Sentence examples for annual tariffs from inspiring English sources

If Congress fails to pass the broader legislation, the most immediate practical consequence would be that the European Union will continue to impose as much as $4 billion in annual tariffs on American products ranging from lumber to jewelry.

That would be unprecedented only in size: since 1999, the United States has been using $117 million in annual tariffs to retaliate against the European Union's ban on American beef imports, a ban the trade organization also deemed illegal.

Heathrow had submitted a plan to the Civil Aviation Authority seeking to raise annual tariffs for airlines by 4.6% above RPI inflation.

Heathrow had submitted a plan, rejected by the CAA, seeking to raise annual tariffs for airlines by 4.6% above RPI inflation.

TRUMP PLANS TO ANNOUNCE $50 BILLION IN ANNUAL TARIFFS AND OTHER PENALTIES ON CHINA "For its theft of technology and trade secrets".

That designation removed the uncertainty of annual tariff renewals and spurred large-scale investments and activity from both U.S. and Chinese companies, accelerating what had been gradually shifting trends in global production and trade flows amid China's rise, said Peter Schott of Yale University, who wrote a paper on the subject with Justin Pierce of the Federal Reserve.

Without that annual vote, tariffs on many goods would have increased, in some cases quite sharply.

This frenzy continued even after the European Union began exercising its right in March to impose up to $4 billion in annual retaliatory tariffs on American products from lumber to jewelry.

Last August, the WTO authorized the EU to impose up to $4 billion in annual retaliatory tariffs on imports from the U.S. The EU has warned it will begin imposing those sanctions in January unless Congress makes significant progress towards repealing the ETI by fall.

While developing countries under WTO rules have been granted 'less than full reciprocation' in their tariff-reduction schedules, present negotiations for increased 'non-agricultural market access' (NAMA negotiations) could result in annual net tariff losses for developing countries of USD 63 billion, but losses of only USD 38 billion for developed countries [ 87, 88].

Recent data for 2013 from the Feed-in-Tariff Evaluatiof Commithee (Chōtatsukakakutō Santeiiinkai) of the Japanese METI, which reviews and decides on the annual feed-in tariffs for RE in Japan, also underline the significant higher investment costs in Japan, although equipment costs have dropped recently also in Japan, in particular for solar installations [52].