The phrase "animals for human consumption" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in discussions about food sources, agriculture, or ethical considerations regarding the treatment of animals.
Example: "The report highlighted the importance of sustainable practices in raising animals for human consumption."
Alternatives: "livestock for human food" or "animals raised for food."
They believe keeping animals in zoos and aquariums where there are high death rates, using animals in experiments and slaughtering animals for human consumption are permissible as long as these activities are conducted in a humane way.
Just think of the savings in water use if we didn't have the need to raise millions of animals for human consumption!
(Was it given hormones and antibiotics?) None of these questions, however, make any consideration of whether it is wrong to kill animals for human consumption.
The reason is that a number of the earliest cases involved food handlers in markets in Guangdong Province who sold live exotic animals for human consumption.
However, as Health Canada was unable to assess the safety of the GM animals for human consumption, the unversity lost its funding for Enviropigs and the 10 remaining animals were euthanised earlier this year.
Such an agriculture permits a nation to store large quantities of grains and other foodstuffs in concentrated form to be utilized to raise animals for human consumption during such emergencies as war or natural calamity.
US authorities today began the process to approve the first GM animal for human consumption.
The Food and Drug Administration is poised to approve the first genetically modified animal for human consumption, a highly anticipated decision that is stirring controversy and could mark a turning point in the way American food is produced.
An analysis that accounts for Wilbur as an actual nonhuman animal instead of as a representative of the concept of the human child calls into question the naturalization of what Jacques Derrida refers to as the "noncriminal putting to death" of the animal for human consumption (112).
If approved, AquAdvantage would be the first genetically altered animal for human consumption in the United States.
We also had the FDA approving "Frankenfish" without requiring labeling of the world's first genetically modified animal for human consumption.
