angry with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "angry with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing feelings of anger towards a person or entity. Example: "She was angry with her friend for canceling their plans at the last minute."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

"Angry with Washington?

The New York Times

"I got angry with him.

The New Yorker

"Everybody is angry with them".

The New York Times

We are angry with that.

The New York Times

I can't get angry with them".

The New York Times

My wife, also, was angry with me.

The New Yorker

"He was very angry with poaching.

The New Yorker

But who are we really angry with?

Independent

I figured she was angry with me.

The New York Times

Angry with Chopin, what does he know?

The New Yorker

"You can't get angry with them.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "angry with", ensure that the object of your anger is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify the person or entity you are upset with.

Common error

A common mistake is using "angry at" when "angry with" is more appropriate for expressing anger towards a person. While both are acceptable, "angry with" often emphasizes a personal connection or relationship with the object of anger. Prefer "angry with a person" and "angry at a situation".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "angry with" functions as a subject complement, specifically an adjectival phrase, describing the state or feeling of being angry towards a particular person or thing. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is a commonly used and grammatically sound construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Wiki

20%

Science

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

12%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "angry with" is a grammatically correct and very common way to express feelings of anger or displeasure toward a person or entity. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and wide-ranging applicability. While alternatives like "mad at" or "annoyed by" exist, "angry with" maintains a neutral register, suitable for diverse contexts. Remember to clearly define the object of your anger for clarity and avoid misusing "angry at" when referring to people.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Mad at

A very common and direct synonym for angry, often used in American English.

Furious at

Suggests a higher degree of anger, bordering on rage, and uses a different preposition.

Annoyed by

Indicates a mild level of irritation, less intense than anger.

Irritated with

Similar to 'annoyed by', suggesting a slight frustration.

Cross with

A more informal way of saying angry; quite common in British English.

Upset by

Expresses a feeling of distress or unhappiness caused by someone or something.

Indignant about

Implies a feeling of righteous anger or resentment, often due to perceived injustice.

Displeased with

Indicates dissatisfaction or disapproval, a more formal way to express being unhappy.

Resentful of

Highlights a feeling of bitterness or ill will towards someone or something.

Bitter about

Expresses a deep-seated feeling of disappointment and anger, often related to past experiences.

FAQs

Is it better to say "angry at" or "angry with"?

Both phrases are correct, but "angry with" is typically used when referring to a person, while "angry at" is more common when referring to a situation or thing. For example, you might be "angry with" a friend but "angry at" the traffic.

What are some less intense alternatives to "angry with"?

If you want to express a milder form of displeasure, consider using phrases like "annoyed by", "irritated with", or "displeased with".

Can "mad at" be used interchangeably with "angry with"?

Yes, "mad at" is a common and often interchangeable alternative to "angry with", particularly in American English. Both convey a similar meaning of feeling upset or displeased with someone or something.

When is it inappropriate to use the phrase "angry with"?

While "angry with" is generally suitable for most situations, it might be less appropriate in very formal contexts where more nuanced or professional language is preferred. Consider using more descriptive terms to explain the nature of your displeasure rather than simply stating you are "angry with" someone.