Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In contrast, the dip angle for model 2, 52° (>45°), seems peculiar as a reverse fault in terms of Anderson's theory.
Or we confirmed that the dip angle for model 2 can be <45° when the eastern corner of the top edge is near the coastline, although this setting leads to a smaller fault and higher stress drop deviating from the scaling relation.
Similar(58)
Fig. 11 a The mean dip estimates (dark gray) when viewing the top of the model only and correct dip angle for each model (light gray) in Experiment 3. b Frequency distribution of responses that fell within angle bins in Experiment 3. Are the visual inferences of dip angles based on memory for the object?
Fred Astaire and Audrey Hepburn, 1956 In Funny Face, Fred Astaire played a fashion photographer, here trying to find the best angle for his model (Hepburn).
The magnetic dip angle for the model ranges from 30° to 60°.
The procedure can be divided into four steps: (1) calculation of the reflected light intensity as a function of the incident angle for the model shown in Fig. 2 without the water layer; (2) estimation of neff from the excitation angle, using Eq. (1); (3) incorporation of a 0.2-nm-thick water layer into the model; and (4) repetition of steps (1)–(3) until the water layer thickness is 2.0 nm.
The great soundness and completeness theorems for different proof systems (or, from the other angle, for different model-theoretic semantics) show that, in an important sense, the two approaches coincide, at least in extension.
Figure 5 displays the displacement amplitudes versus the dimensionless horizontal distance and the incident angle for three models with material 3 to manifest the influence of incident angles on the surface motions.
Open image in new window Figure 13 C p versus angle of rotation for model 2. Open image in new window Figure 14 C p versus angle of rotation for model 3. Pressure contours generated from numerical simulation of model 1, model 2, and model 3 for three different Reynolds numbers are shown in Figure 15a,b,c, respectively.
Open image in new window Figure 10 C q versus angle of rotation for model 2. Open image in new window Figure 11 C q versus angle of rotation for model 3. Power coefficient (Cp) was calculated using the relationship between Cp and Cq which is Cp = Cq × λ at three different Re for all three models.
Open image in new window Figure 9 C q versus angle of rotation for model 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com