The phrase "and when it concludes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the end of an event, process, or discussion, indicating a point in time when something finishes.
Example: "We will discuss the project details, and when it concludes, we can move on to the next agenda item."
Alternatives: "and once it ends" or "and after it finishes".
The ICC is required to give first opportunity to investigate and prosecute a case to the nation/state involved, and will step in only when it concludes the nation is not making a good-faith effort to hold anyone accountable.
When it concludes, Mr. Holland has the stirred and shaken expression of someone surprised not only by physical desire but also by a feeling that's stranger and stronger.
Wiggins is poised to become the first British rider to win Le Tour when it concludes in Paris on Sunday.
This articLate lastally appeared on VICE US.
Late last month, a study in the New England Journal of Medicine sparked national coverage and outrage when it concluded that about 4,645 people may have died in Puerto Rico due to the effects of Hurricane Maria between its landfall on September 20 and the end of 2017.
Many assumed that the 10 episodes would tell the entire arc of Escobar's rise and fall and were surprised when it concluded before the gun battle that ended his life.
It also found the tribunal's reasoning "puzzling" and "deeply unconvincing" when it concluded the minister had breached the appointments code.
In a special investigative series, McClatchy News documented how Goldman Sachs, working through Cayman Island subsidiaries, "peddled billions of dollars in shaky securities tied to subprime mortgages on unsuspecting pension funds, insurance companies and other investors when it concluded that the housing bubble would burst".
Mr. Steyer and others said that MTV overstepped when it concluded that its regular fare would be acceptable to the huge audience that watches the Super Bowl.
The ruling follows a one-day appeal court hearing earlier this month during which James Eadie QC, on behalf of the home secretary, argued that Siac – in effect Britain's anti-terror court – had "erred in law" and taken the wrong approach when it concluded that Qatada could not be sent back to Jordan because he would not face a fair trial.
