The phrase "and volume of drinking" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the amount or frequency of alcohol consumption in various contexts, such as health studies or social discussions.
Example: "The research focused on the effects of alcohol on health, particularly the frequency and volume of drinking among participants."
Alternatives: "amount of alcohol consumed" or "level of alcohol intake".
Two of the six trials for comorbid mental health compared MI with education or informational controls and found positive outcomes at 6 months with regard to frequency or volume of drinking.
Thus, this method was used to predict social capital indicators on the volume of drinking.
With respect to our first outcome measure, i.e., volume of alcohol consumption, we found that social networking with male friends was positively associated with the volume of drinking.
Although the dose-response associations for the different outcome categories are different (3), they all share the problem of finding the appropriate control group for the effect of volume of drinking.
Information on the type and volume of alcoholic drinks consumed, age group, sex, drinking habit, and drinking on empty stomach or with/after meal was recorded for each participant.
During the 60 days of the experiment, the animals were weighed each week and the volume of drinking solution was measured.
We recorded the weight of each duplicate meal portion (grams wet weight) and the volume of drinking water (milliliters) collected in a 24-hr period as the daily dietary intake rate and drinking water intake rate, respectively.
Field scale ex-situ treatment systems based on metallic iron (ZVI) are already available for the production of reduced volumes of drinking water in remote areas (village scale).
These effects are particularly strong in the IFS2 study in Russia, where a steep and consistent increase in risk of raised HDL and Apo A1 was seen as volume and intensity of drinking went up.
The results of the current study tend to support this hypothesis: total water intake, water from fluids and the reported volume of drinking water and other beverages types calculated from the online 7-day record were significantly higher compared to those calculated from the paper 7-day record.
