and validated with the

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "and validated with the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of confirming or verifying something in conjunction with another element or factor. Example: "The results of the experiment were analyzed and validated with the data collected from previous studies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

and validated with the experimental results.

Combustion and Flame

The cooling tower numerical model was refined and validated with the experimental data.

Applied Energy

Moreover, a unidimensional model was developed and validated with the experimental results.

Applied Thermal Engineering

A multistage axial turbine model is presented and validated with the best available data from literature.

Applied Energy

The results from the numerical studies have been compared and validated with the experimental results.

Engineering Structures

All models were developed using a portion of the data and validated with the remainder.

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

The modelling was attempted with Finite Difference analysis and validated with the results available in literature.

Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

Hence, a model was firstly calibrated and validated with the open-loop experimental data.

Chemical Engineering Journal

Component and refrigeration cycle models are developed and validated with the experimental data.

Energy Procedia

The results from the analytical model are compared and validated with the experimental results.

International Journal of Impact Engineering

A program has been developed and validated with the experimental study and environmental data.

Energy Conversion and Management

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "and validated with the", ensure the validation method is clearly defined and relevant to the context. For instance, specify whether validation occurred through experimental data, simulations, or established benchmarks.

Common error

Avoid using "and validated with the" if the process was merely a comparison or a superficial check. "Validated" implies a rigorous confirmation, so use words like "compared" or "assessed" if the process was less thorough.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "and validated with the" functions as a conjunction linking a preceding statement (e.g., a method, model, or result) to the means by which it was verified. This indicates that the preceding statement has undergone a process of confirmation or substantiation. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "and validated with the" is a grammatically correct and frequently used conjunction to indicate confirmation or verification of a preceding statement, as validated by Ludwig AI. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it signals a rigorous check against experimental data, models, or established benchmarks. The high frequency in scientific publications on ScienceDirect underscores its formal and precise nature. To use it effectively, always specify the validation method and ensure the validation rigor aligns with the context. Alternatives like "and confirmed by the" or "and verified against the" can be used depending on the specific nuance desired.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

and confirmed by the

Replaces "validated" with "confirmed", indicating a slightly different nuance of verification. "Confirmed" implies a stronger level of proof than "validated".

and verified against the

Substitutes "validated" with "verified", suggesting a check against a standard or expectation. The preposition "with" is replaced with "against".

and corroborated with the

Employs "corroborated" instead of "validated", implying that additional evidence supports the original findings. Corroboration adds weight to the initial validation.

and supported by the

Replaces "validated" with "supported", indicating that the evidence lends credence to the idea. This conveys a less rigorous verification.

and substantiated with the

Uses "substantiated" to suggest that evidence has been provided to prove the claim. This term is more formal than "validated".

and checked against the

Replaces "validated" with "checked", offering a simpler, less formal way to convey verification. The preposition "with" is replaced with "against".

and aligned with the

Suggests that the findings are in agreement with other data or models. This implies consistency rather than direct validation.

and found consistent with the

Highlights consistency between the results and other data, rather than a validation process. Focuses on the outcome of the comparison.

and assessed in relation to the

Indicates an evaluation of the results in the context of something else. This is broader than validation, including analysis and judgment.

and compared with the

Focuses on the comparison of results with other data. Validation implies a more rigorous confirmation, while comparison is a more general evaluation.

FAQs

How can I use "and validated with the" in a sentence?

This phrase is typically used to indicate that a model, method, or result has been confirmed or verified using a specific set of data or criteria. For example, "The model was developed and validated with the experimental data."

What are some alternatives to "and validated with the"?

You can use alternatives such as "and confirmed by the", "and verified against the", or "and supported by the" depending on the level of rigor in the validation process.

Is it always necessary to specify what something was validated with?

Yes, specifying what something was validated with is crucial for transparency and credibility. It allows the audience to understand the basis of the validation and assess its reliability. For example, instead of saying "The method was validated", say "The method was validated with the British Pharmacopoeia method."

What does it mean for a model to be "validated with" something?

When a model is "validated with" something, it means that its results have been compared against that 'something' (typically experimental data or another established model) and found to be acceptably accurate and reliable. This process confirms the model's ability to accurately predict or represent real-world phenomena.