Other possible causes of the observed conflicting results between studies include species differences and use of different experimental models.
The inconsistency in experimental results can be linked to several variables relative to experimental design, such as BP measurement monitoring at differing times postexercise and use of different exercise parameters such as volume, intensity, rest between sets, and training status.
Other phenotypic differences such as metal tolerance, temperature tolerance, and use of different carbon compounds set these organisms apart [ 5, 11, 13].
Various studies in the literature emphasize that there are differences between countries with regards to the acceptance and use of different technologies (Sun & Zhang, 2006; Lee et al., 2007; Al-Gahtani et al., 2007; Im et al., 2011).
This difference may be explained by different assay protocols and use of different secondary antibodies.
This contradiction may result from differences in study design, use of different animal models, and use of different garlic formulations and preparations.
In Mukugodo, we postulate that social and economic differentiation influences household perception and use of different livelihood strategies.
The options explored include operation in different batch operating units and use of different molar ratios of reactants.
Attitude to healthy eating and use of different information sources were weakly but significantly related to level of nutrition knowledge.
Seasonal movements of stock and use of different landscapes between the dry and wet season grazing areas were the most common features of land use.
