Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The first model included only household-level determinants, while the second and the third models included both household- and district-level determinants.
Out of these six models, this product shows a significant association in only two cases (i.e. the second and the third models of Table 4).
Similar(58)
The second model has tubes constituted by pores and the third model has a spiral tube constituted by pores too.
One of the three independent reactions modeled the decomposition of hemicellulose and cellulose, the second modeled the main decomposition of PP and remaining cellulose, and the third modeled the decomposition of lignin and remaining cellulose and PP.
The author found that the first model was the best for the United States; the second model served as the most efficient for predicting math achievement in Egypt, and the third model performed the best in Canada and South Africa.
In particular, I estimated three reduced models for each dependent variable: the first model including only the four policy variables, the second model testing only implementation variables, and the third model with all policy and implementation variables.
Goodness of fit indices indicated that the first and the third model should be rejected.
In addition to these variables, the second model contained friend in group, and the third model contained gender.
The first model included health-related factors; the second model added special characteristics of North Korean defectors; and the third model added demographic and socio-economic factors.
The first model included patient characteristics, the second model included details of intubation procedures, and the third model included both sets of factors.
Our first supplementary model (model B) included all the variables except for deprivation and ethnicity, the second model (model C) included deprivation but not ethnicity, and the third (model D) included ethnicity but not deprivation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com