Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The only parameters assumed are the duration T, the number N p of pulses, and the maximal width W. The multipulse signal, x t), supported on the interval [−T/2, T/2], which can be expressed as x t)={displaystyle sum_{n=1}^N{h}_n}(t), mathrm{where} { max}_nleft|mathrm{supp}{h}_nright|le W (1).
In volunteers, the mean height of the saccule was 1.40 ± 0.10 mm (mean ± SD) and the maximal height was 1.6 mm, with a range from 1.10 to 1.60 mm (Fig. 5); the mean normal width of the saccule was 1.20 ± 0.10 mm and the maximal width was 1.40 mm.
The one-piece device is 360 μm in length, and the maximal width of the conical head is 230 μm.
Each tumour's maximum diameter (L) and the maximal width at right angles to that axis (W) were measured once a week.
Analysis of covariance was performed for absolute skin hydration levels and the maximal width of the largest wrinkle and mean depth of wrinkles.
Evans' index (a linear ratio between the maximal frontal horn width and the maximal width of the inner skull - normally <0.3 [ 14]) was calculated when the radiologist's report suggested hydrocephalus whenever possible.
Similar(54)
The maximal wound diameter was selected by measuring serial sections across the wound and taking the maximal width located at the center of the circular wound.
The shells of 429 individuals were measured for length (L), height (H) and width (W) with a calliper: "L" is the maximal anteroposterior dimension, "H" is the maximal dorsoventral dimension and "W" is the maximal width of the valves.
Hip circumference was measured at the maximal width over the greater trochanters, and waist circumference was measured midway between the iliac crest and the rib cage.
The changes in the maximal width of the largest wrinkle and mean wrinkle depth from the baseline value after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment are shown in Table 4.
In the placebo group, the percent change in the maximal width of the largest wrinkle and mean wrinkle depth from baseline increased at 8 weeks (3.96%±4.23% and 0.73%±0.96%, respectively), whereas the values were lower at 8 weeks compared with those at baseline in the AVGP group (−2.18%±4.09%and−0.11%±1.0%0%±4.09%and−0.11%±1.0%
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com