In brief, the expected cell growth (Sexp), defined as the product of the cell growth observed after exposure to drug A and that observed after drug B, and the observed cell growth (Sobs) after the exposure to the combination of A and B were used to construct an index (RI): R=Sexp/Sobs.
The discrepancy between the turbulence level set by the standard turbulence model constants and that observed in the atmosphere is discussed.
Comparisons are made between the nonlinear behavior observed in the oxidation of ethanol and that observed in the oxidation of methanol.
The weakness of the proposed model exists, however, in the lack of the correspondence between the predicted Co island periodicity and that observed in the STM images (i.e., Co-1 × 1 vs. Co-2 × 2).
This behaviour and that observed in other polymer blends, suggest that, assuming isotropy and constant crystallinity content, the relation between increased miscibility level and improved ductility is not a general rule.
In general, the variability during daylight hours is about 30% of median or less, and that observed for night time hours is greater than the mentioned percentage, particularly at last hours of the night near the northern peak of the EA.
The relative expression level was defined as the ratio between the expression of hilD or foxA in each mutant derivative and that observed in the UA1888 strain containing a wild-type upstream Fur promoter region (PhilD).
We found that some cell lines (HeLa and CHO-K1) appear to respond only to high doses of USEP and that observed effects progressed from subtle membrane changes (PS externalization) to Pr uptake to death.
We used the Pearson goodness-of-fit x2 and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) x2 tests to estimate the magnitude of the differences between the event rate predicted by the logistic models and that observed in the cases and controls to which the models were applied [24], [25].
Although we are not aware of reports describing transcription factor binding within the deleted region of our ΔCTCF-NA mutant, we cannot rule out the possibility that the deletion of CTCF has no effect at all on transcriptional activity and that observed effects are due to displacement of factors other than CTCF.
Data are expressed as the absorbance difference observed in the presence of nuclear extracts and that observed in the absence of nuclear extracts.
