The phrase "and reproducibility in the" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing scientific research, experiments, or methodologies where reproducibility is a key factor.
Example: "The study emphasizes the importance of transparency and reproducibility in the research process."
Alternatives: "and replicability in the" or "and consistency in the".
RSD values found were well with the acceptable range indicating that these methods have excellent repeatability and reproducibility in the current experimental condition.
With increasing progress and application of rational methods in engineering, SSF will achieve higher levels in standardisation and reproducibility in the future.
The Dental Prescale system allows occlusal contact pressure to be measured quickly and easily across the dentition, and it is of enormous clinical utility because its accuracy and reproducibility in the molar region have been confirmed [16, 20, 22].
This instrument uses the non-stationary hot-wire method at constant heat flow and operates in the temperature range from − 10 to + 200 °C with precision and reproducibility in the order of 2%.
Cross-species analyses may lead to problems of reliability and reproducibility in the obtained results.
We take these studies as inspiration and present our own variations on these themes in what follows, in an effort to determine accuracy and reproducibility in the predictions of correlated amino acid substitution algorithms.
Despite the obvious advantages of simplicity and reproducibility in this synthetic method, the morphology of such composites and the size of MnO2 particles are normally hard to control.
The abundant information, non-stationarity, poor repeatability and reproducibility in this process lead to the necessity to find the corresponding method of feature extraction and fault recognition.
However, considering its accuracy and reproducibility in stress condition, the routine performance of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to diagnose diabetes during the acute phase of ACS is still the subject of ongoing debate.
Quantification with standards requires evaluation of precision and reproducibility in order to understand the limitations of the method.
Although RT PCR is very sensitive, its clinical utility may be limited by lack of automation and reproducibility in clinical samples, reflected in the conflicting literature and the number of reported 'false' positives or negatives.
