Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "and relevant differences in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing distinctions or variations that are pertinent to a particular subject or context.
Example: "The study aims to analyze the similarities and relevant differences in the two approaches to problem-solving."
Alternatives: "and significant variations in" or "and important distinctions in".
Exact(2)
The question is whether there are important and relevant differences in patient satisfaction, quality of life and convenience of use that were not examined in the study.
Our major findings show that the eosinophilic (OVA-induced) and the neutrophilic (OVA + LPS induced) asthma models encompass significant and relevant differences in their protein patterns, which could not be delineated by common techniques used for characterization of airway inflammation, such as inflammatory cell counts and lung mechanics.
Similar(58)
A clinically significant and relevant difference in the principal outcome, knowledge, between the two groups, will be set at 20%.
Results uncover phylogenetically and taxonomically relevant differences in morphology and bone histology, contradicting the current phylogenetic hypothesis.
Predefined subgroup analyses revealed that patients recruited by sport physicians (n=30) did not benefit from the intervention, whereas those recruited by general practitioners (n=101) showed significant and clinically relevant differences in pain and function in favour of the intervention group.
Both methods proved to be safe in cervical priming and no relevant differences in mode of delivery and outcome of labour were detected.
The BR.21 placebo-controlled trial of erlotinib demonstrated that therapy with this EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in terms of overall and progression-free survival compared to the placebo (Shepherd et al, 2005).
Since we found no differences in bone quantitative measurements, muscle strength and clinically relevant differences in total ROM we think that ITW and decreased ROM of the ankle joints are rather a local stiffness than a local manifestation of a systemic problem.
Both Test and Reference products were well tolerated, with no serious AEs and no relevant differences in safety profiles.
Since we found no differences in bone qualitative measurements, muscle strength and clinical relevant differences in total range of joint motion we think that ITW and stiff ankle joints might be an expression of a local problem rather than generalized stiffness or systemic aetiology.
Furthermore, comparisons between fitness categories revealed significant and clinically relevant differences in the mortality risk reduction between races.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com