Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "and no significant differences were identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in research or analytical contexts to indicate that a comparison did not reveal any notable variations between groups or conditions.
Example: "The results of the study were conclusive, and no significant differences were identified between the control and experimental groups."
Alternatives: "and no notable differences were found" or "and no meaningful differences were detected."
Exact(7)
Relaxation responses to increasing concentrations (1 nM to 10 µM) of the NO donor SNP were similar in tissues from control and mildly arthritic animals, and no significant differences were identified.
Social interaction emerged as a secondary issue and no significant differences were identified between customer categories.
The pathogenicity was tested for both wild type Guy11 and Mosdi1 ReGFP mutants, and no significant differences were identified among the strains.
The causes of death were compared between patients in the RT and non-RT groups, and no significant differences were identified (p = 0.461).
IL1RAPL2 was not expressed in any cell subset in PBC or controls, and no significant differences were identified for UBE2A in the three subsets investigated (data not shown).
While no resistance to CPA has previously been identified in M. truncatula, only three pairs of closely-related lines of M. truncatula were assayed and no significant differences were identified following CPA infestation [ 20].
Similar(53)
No significant differences were identified between groups in demographic and peri-operative variables.
No significant differences were identified.
No significant differences were identified for sex or race.
No significant differences were identified among geographical regions; however, several differences were observed among medical specialties.
No significant differences were identified (data not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com