The phrase "and must be compared" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something requires a comparison with another item or set of data.
Example: "The results of the experiment are significant and must be compared to previous studies to draw valid conclusions."
Alternatives: "and should be contrasted" or "and needs to be evaluated against".
Such comparisons are often a trap: they suggest that women artists exist only in the context of one another, and must be compared, so that some may be deemed insufficiently radical.
The magnitude of these differences is generally very small and must be compared with the resolution in the virtual vertical height of the ionosonde, resolution which is typically of the order of few kilometers.
It sets up a straight confrontation between science and other belief-systems as if they are all aiming to do the same thing (give us "knowledge of the world") and must be compared for how well they deliver the goods.
The output of the G i function is a Z score which represents the statistical significance of clustering for a specified distance and must be compared to the range of values for a particular confidence level.
This result is due to the fact that the FREAK descriptor is a binary descriptor which uses simple Hamming distance calculations for descriptor matching, while SURF and SIFT descriptors are a vector of real numbers and must be compared using Euclidean norms.
The elements with a potential impact on the ease of use of drugs by patients or physicians are represented in Figure 5 and must be compared between the new product and other drugs with the same indication.
The intervention must be relevant and feasible to be generalised to clinical practice and it must be compared to the best available usual care (reference care).
Action will have costs, and these must be compared with the costs of not acting.
Otherwise, the arbitrary selection of the change point increases the degrees of freedom of the latter model and AIC0 must be compared with AIC12 = AIC1 + AIC2 + 2k (n), where k(n) is a penalty term estimated by a Monte Carlo simulation (Ogata, 1992).
However, given the importance of the flanking regions in the specificity of the RGD-sequences data from mouse and man must be compared with cautiousness.
In order to verify the population consequences of intraindividual purifying selection, population genetic data in nucleus and mtDNA must be compared with the same set of individuals.
