The phrase "and methods for quantifying" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing various techniques or approaches for measuring or assessing something in a specific context, such as research or analysis.
Example: "The study explores various theories and methods for quantifying the impact of climate change on biodiversity."
Alternatives: "and techniques for measuring" or "and approaches for assessing".
Biostatistics comprises ideas and methods for quantifying the evidence in data to distinguish among competing hypotheses, for estimating unknown characteristics of populations, and for quantifying the uncertainty in those estimates.
This comprehensive approach to joint pathology is, however, far from the norm across different species and models, and methods for quantifying histopathology in joint tissues other than cartilage have not been standardized [ 87].
These exercises help clarify important knowledge gaps such as a relatively poor understanding of the role of nonclimatic factors (socioeconomic and other) that may modify future climatic influences and a lack of empiric evidence and methods for quantifying more complex climate health relationships, which consequently are often excluded from consideration.
(See web extra note 8 for further discussion of amplification and methods for quantifying it).
As a consensus has not been reached, further study will help to clarify the best imaging modality and method for quantifying glenohumeral bone loss.
Over the past decade, instrument and palpation methods for quantifying the activation and recruitment of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus have been proposed.
We discuss strengths and limitations of this and other methods for quantifying the impact of WNV on bird populations.
Chamberlain et al. (2 ) compared several indirect and direct methods for quantifying arbovirus transmission and concluded that allowing mosquitoes to feed on serum (similar to the capillary method) is less efficient in detecting virus than other methods.
In light of its importance as a site of toxic injury, considerable attention has been focused on the development of sensitive and accurate methods for quantifying cell injury and cell death in the proximal tubule.
The aim of this research is to provide such an insight into currently established and proposed methods for quantifying resilience of infrastructure systems and suggest a methodological framework that effectively responds to the requirements of resilience measuring.
The Pico Method and Glenoid Index method were the most accurate and reliable methods for quantifying glenoid bone loss, particularly when using three-dimensional CT (3DCT).
