The phrase "and is not governed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something operates independently or is not subject to control or regulation.
Example: "This area of research is innovative and is not governed by traditional methodologies."
Alternatives: "and is not regulated" or "and operates independently".
These results show that recovery from invasion and removal occurs gradually and is not governed by top-down effects.
(Belair, supra, 47 Cal .3dat p. 565). If the public entity's conduct is unreasonable and a substantial cause of damage, the entity "is liable only for the proportionate amount of damage caused by its actions". (Locklin, supra, 7 Cal .4that p. 368). This inverse condemnation rule invokes constitutional balancing principles and is not governed by tort concepts of fault or negligence.
This is much longer than the biologically occurring d-RNAs, and is not governed by degradation but by uptake into phagocytes, such as hepatic Kupffer cells.
However, the present P-wave spectrum is rather proportional to ∼ 1/f3, which is observed for usual earthquakes and is not governed by the scaling law for slow events.
Some of New York's largest museums, including the Met, operate under legislative charters and are not governed by the regulations.
Religious cemeteries are owned and managed by churches and synagogues and are not governed by the state law.
Such decisions are subject to the oversight of the Investment Committee of the Board of Trustees and University Policy 3.1, Accepting University Gifts, respectively, and are not governed by this policy.
"Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food... and are not governed by the same laws".
This organizing issue is challenging, because stakeholders of a DEE are self-organizing and are not governed by any formal authority.
Cryptocurrencies have inherently low levels of regulation and are not governed by a central authority, meaning the transactions can't be closely monitored.
It seems, then, that Roberts used the principle of translation invariance to accept the penalty for not buying X, but he didn't apply it to the case of those who accede to the "mandate". Instead, he said the mandate per se (as opposed to the penalty for not complying with the mandate) was unconstitutional and was not governed by the Commerce Clause.
