The phrase "and intervention groups in terms of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing or comparing different groups in a study or analysis, particularly in the context of their characteristics or outcomes.
Example: "The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatments and intervention groups in terms of patient recovery rates."
Alternatives: "and intervention groups regarding" or "and intervention groups concerning".
A chi-square test was used to check the baseline comparability between the control and intervention groups in terms of key demographic characteristics and number of chronic diseases.
Results showed that there were no significant differences between the control and intervention groups in terms of demographic factors, including age, sex, education level, communication abilities, marital status, and types of services received.
This may be due to a variety of factors such as low methodological quality but may also be due to a failure of the randomisation to balance differences between control and intervention groups in terms of prognosis due to random error.
2. Baseline comparison of the two intervention groups in terms of the variables measured, prognostic factors and descriptive variables.
On average the control group was slightly more severely affected than the intervention group in terms of activity level communication, dysphagia, and activities of daily living.
Third, results showed a positive trend of improvement among subjects in the intervention group in terms of their socialization skills, although this was not statistically significant.
There was no difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of sexual behaviour.
Statistical analysis compared the intervention and control groups in terms of baseline information, and outcomes at 3 and 6 months.
Differences between intervention and control groups in terms of children's growth were not statistically significant, although they were in the expected direction.
Differences between the intervention and the control group in terms of their performance on the study measures are shown in Table 3.
The developed system allows for a prioritization of intervention both for management and interventions planning, in terms of restoration, consolidation, and conservation.
