Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Of these, 15 were deemed eligible and included in the final review.
Similar(59)
Thirty-six studies met all inclusion and critical appraisal criteria and were included in the final review.
Forty-one papers were reviewed in full, a further 25 papers were excluded and 16 papers were included in the final review (see Fig. 1).
Only observational studies, cohort studies, and randomized control trials were included in the final review.
After screening for duplicates and eligibility, 102 articles were included in the final review (listed in additional file 2).
Two reviewers (MA/TQ) undertook reference tracking and citation tracking for papers included in the final review.
Author 1 (NP) was responsible for the retrieval and review of studies to be included in the final review.
The characteristics and results of the three studies included in the final review are summarized in Table 1.
This patient was 60 months of follow-up, and this case of revision was included in the final review.
Both authors (SR and AB) reviewed the final 20 studies independently and reached consensus on which papers were included in the final review.
KL and SS did the initial review, the selection of abstracts, and the identification of papers to be included in the final review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com