Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
We screened patients who underwent CABG (n = 5,364) and excluded those who underwent simultaneous CABG and valvular surgery (n = 570).
We contacted authors of relevant articles when further data collection was necessary and excluded those that could not supply necessary data.
We assessed medical records of all identified cases (n = 314) and excluded those with: 1) procedures other than thrombectomy, and 2) aphasia, or no command of Danish or English.
We asked the patients whether they had been previously diagnosed with depression and excluded those who reported previous depression themselves or whose medical reports showed that they had a previous diagnosis of depression.
We included people with CPTH/CER and HACRS in the main analyses and excluded those seven persons with other secondary chronic headaches due to the low numbers and consequent statistical limitations.
In all cases analysis was restricted to sequences of sufficient length, and excluded those containing excessive blank positions.
We included only studies that reported laboratory-confirmed estimates and excluded those providing clinical diagnoses alone, removing a potential source of misclassification bias.
Subjects compared were those presenting acutely and excluded those with underlying immunosuppression or severe underlying disease (see Methods for criteria to assign disease categories).
We examined the distribution of the school-level average asthma and excluded those schools whose asthma prevalence was >98th percentile (schools with >38% of student body with asthma).
Additionally, we evaluated the detection probabilities (comparing signal intensities against background noise) for all CpGs and excluded those CpGs with values of P>0.01 in more than 15% of cases (Figure S1A).
Of the remaining, streamlined set of GWAS-discovered associations, we selected those where only one gene had been implicated and excluded those associations that mapped to loci with multiple potentially implicated genes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com