The phrase "and errors owing to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to mistakes or inaccuracies that are attributed to a specific cause or reason.
Example: "The report highlighted the inaccuracies in the data and errors owing to miscommunication among team members."
Alternatives: "and mistakes due to" or "and inaccuracies resulting from".
Subsequently, serum PL as a biomarker directly reflecting intake ratio of n-3/n-6 facidsacids has the advantage of providing more objective ratio of n-3/n-6 PUFA in vivo, independent of subjective recall bias and probable measurable errors owing to dietary questionnaire tools used.
Moreover, the exposure and outcome were predefined, which reduces the risk of chance findings and decreases the risk of systematic errors owing to misclassification.
There are also potential preanalytic errors owing to sample handling and the well-recognized lability of glucose in the collection tube at room temperature (36, 37).
Figure 4a shows that the error estimates derived from the inner loop (model selection: ave.PE internal ) differ remarkably from the theoretical prediction errors owing to model selection bias and sample size effects.
Reasons for false-negative results include sampling errors owing to the multifocal evolution of VAP, prior antimicrobial treatment, and borderline results in an early stage of infection.
The official position of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has been that errors owing to quality changes have probably tended to offset each other, at least in its index of consumer prices.
However, odometry may generate estimation errors owing to slip when the vehicle travels on an uneven terrain.
In most cases, a large moment release at the last time window was suggested to be errors owing to uncertainties in the inversion analysis.
Comparisons with previously published prediction equations showed considerable disagreement in some aspects, and suggest that using stiff, full-scale netting in past model experiments have produced significant model-to-full-scale prediction errors owing to the poor equivalence of twine bending-stiffness-to-netting-tension ratio.
Subgroup analyses were susceptible to type II errors owing to relatively small sample sizes.
