Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
The phrase "and earmarked to a" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in contexts where funds or resources are designated for a specific purpose or recipient.
Example: "The budget includes a significant amount of money that is earmarked to a local charity for community development projects."
Alternatives: "designated for" or "allocated to".
Exact(1)
But benefit carwashing crews have at least one clear advantage: The money they earn is theirs alone and earmarked to a specific cause.
Similar(59)
Most grants and donations are usually earmarked to a particular cause or project.
It is not the Police Department, nor the Corporation Counsel, but the Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications, which is earmarked to receive a $7.7 million increase next year.
A15 NEW YORK/REGION B1-7 Bloomberg's Pet Agency Reflects His Background The Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications, which is earmarked to receive a $7.7 million increase next year, is one of the few city agencies that has avoided Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's budget cuts.
When the theater was being developed, Mr. Tear remembered, the bar area "was earmarked to be a cookie and coffee bar.
Although the funds now earmarked to demolish and rebuild a number of multifamily housing structures in the 2200 block of North Catalina Street cannot be legally used to fill the budget hole, the spending comes at a time when the future of the Redevelopment Agency — and its funding — remains uncertain.
A further £19m is earmarked to develop existing sites and create a new 'one-stop-shop' for residents in Broadgate.
This is a series we earmarked to get over the line and get a win.
"I don't think that's the case and certainly a couple of those... are earmarked to go down.
Special block grants are earmarked to high priority areas such as heart surgery and cancer treatment.
However, there is often a divergent view between MoH and MoF on earmarking of these funds and MoH does not always get through its view that money raised through these mechanisms should be earmarked to health.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com