Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "and compared the programme" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the act of evaluating or analyzing a programme in relation to another for the purpose of assessment or understanding differences.
Example: "The researchers conducted a thorough analysis of the new curriculum and compared the programme with the previous one to identify improvements."
Alternatives: "and evaluated the programme" or "and assessed the programme".
Exact(2)
In the essay, Robson discussed the moral contradictions of Doctor Who and compared the programme with religious texts as a cultural touchstone.
Website TV Scoop said that the programme was "a great experiment", but did not approve of the inclusion of "fame hungry" participants and compared the programme to the most recent series of Big Brother.
Similar(58)
Builders have compared the programme to the coalition government "shopping at Tesco" while Labour was "shopping at Selfridges".
And if you think Jane Austen something of a high-flown parallel for a mere sitcom, the Los Angeles Times compared the programme to the work of Marcel Proust.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the injuries in the SC programme of Kashmar (population 149,358) with injuries in counties in Iran that have not applied the SC model.
To assess the survival rate of vitrified oocytes used in an egg recipient programme and compare the clinical outcomes of pregnancy and live-birth rates per warmed oocyte with fresh autologous oocytes.
The method used provides a useful tool to assess and compare the effects of different education programmes on self-reported behaviour.
These questionnaires may be useful in assessing and comparing the effects of interventions and programmes for chronic and disabling conditions on patient-perceived changes in quality of life.
- To establish a standardized methodology describing each steps of the CLTS approach as a framework to compile meaningful data and compare the cost efficiency of the CLTS programmes in the WCAR countries.
A cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the programmes, was made.
Likewise, claims that vertical financing is often used inefficiently are difficult to verify and compare: if the programmes in question had not been vertical, then the funds might not have been used for their intended purpose at all.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com