The phrase "and comparable to alternative" is not correct as it is missing a noun after "alternative" to clarify what is being compared.
You can use a corrected version of this phrase when discussing similarities between two or more options or choices.
Example: "The new product is effective and comparable to alternative solutions on the market."
Alternatives: "and similar to alternatives" or "and on par with alternatives".
Finally, CVCs were associated with a trend to increased mortality, but amongst chronic dialysis starts, the mortality risk of CVCs was attenuated and comparable to patients with alternative access.
The results indicate that the proposed method is highly efficient compared to alternative methods, while producing comparable results.
In summary, this study by Drs. Schwartz and Labow's group offers further support to the premise that laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC provides short-term benefits to patients without compromising long-term oncologic outcomes, thus providing a safe and comparable alternative to open liver resections for HCC in experienced hands.
Currier and Simpson's 2001 study suggested that treatment with risperidone liquid concentrate and oral lorazepam was a tolerable and comparable alternative to IM haloperidol and lorazepam for short-term treatment of agitated psychosis in patients who accept oral medications [ 12].
The RMDQ-23 is the most commonly used questionnaire for measuring this construct in people with LBP [ 51], and has demonstrated a reliability, responsiveness and validity comparable to the available alternative questionnaires [ 52– 52].
Under different conditions, large operons could be transcribed as smaller sub-operons, resulting in many alternative transcripts, suggesting that the operon structures in M. Pneumonia were highly complex and dynamic, a phenomenon that was comparable to the alternative splicing in eukaryotes [ 23].
This makes it ideal for rapid and economical analysis of novel isolates, while maintaining comparable accuracy to alternative analysis methods [ 31, 34].
The developed protocol was reliable and highly reproducible and produced results that are comparable to data from alternative quantification methods.
The level of trust (83%) in dietitians was high compared with Dutch public trust ratings in complementary and alternative medicine (45%) and was comparable to public trust ratings in general practitioners (89%) and physical therapists (87%) [ 27].
