The phrase "and communities to generate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the involvement of communities in the process of creating or producing something.
Example: "We aim to empower individuals and communities to generate innovative solutions to local challenges."
Alternatives: "and communities to create" or "and communities to produce".
Our new Feed-In Tariffs incentive will enable households and communities to generate their own renewable electricity and sell it back to the grid through a "clean energy cashback".
These properties (exact replication infinite times at zero marginal cost) improve the scalability of operations and make it easy to combine new and old business processes and connect industries and communities to generate novel opportunities.
Liberal Democrat, Conservative and backbench Labour MPs, along with environmental groups, have been calling for a tariff to offer incentives for households, businesses and communities to generate energy from renewable sources (such as solar, wind or biomass) and feed it back into the national grid.
In our proposal, we use trust chain and communities to generate security access and distributed services.
This ensures that the growth of community energy could play a critical part in maintaining the rise of the co-operative economy, and enabling communities to generate their own wealth.
By sharing our experience of carrying out a research project to explore the intersections of faith, culture, health and food in these communities to generate evidence for addressing cultural difference in the design and provision of health services, we have emphasised the importance of building trust and working in culturally sensitive ways in order to be inclusive in our research practices.
It is now within reach for individual research groups in the eco-evolutionary and conservation community to generate de novo draft genome sequences for any organism of choice.
The project mobilised the community to generate demand and inclusiveness, and it ensured quality care by providing periodic supportive supervision and second-opinion clinics.
The first used a consensus activity within a well defined policy community to generate and frame policy options.
Moreover, lack of understanding of the relations between ecosystem services and human well-being traces ultimately to a failure of the scientific community to generate, synthesize, and effectively convey the necessary information to the public.
We argue that there should be a systematic, transparent, and inclusive effort by the IO community to generate scenarios for future MRIO tables, including data generated by integrated assessment models and studies of the possible efficiency and material requirements of future technology.
