Exact(13)
Statement and branch coverage metrics are considered baseline coverage criteria.
Table 15 Statement and branch coverage for Question Database Application Name % # # Covered/ % # # Covered/ Covered Statem.
Quality of the results was evaluated with statement and branch coverage and mutation analysis [25] metrics.
The techniques we used to measure the results of our experiments were statement and branch coverage and mutation analysis.
Logical coverage tests were also evaluated using statement and branch coverage analysis and mutation analysis (Figs. 7, 8, and 9).
Bar charts with the average of the statement and branch coverage results obtained with the tests generated by BETA in the Lua API case study.
Similar(47)
For example, for the Time concern in the OO implementation, statement and branch coverages were 72.2 and 44.6 %, respectively, while the same measures for the AO version were 25.8 and 3.8%%.
Bar charts with the average of the statement coverage results obtained with the tests generated by BETA in each experiment of the b2llvm and C4B case study (original, improved, and randomization) Fig. 8 Branch coverage of the b2llvm and C4B case study.
To evaluate the tests generated by BETA, we used statement coverage, branch coverage, and mutation analysis as metrics.
Branch coverage and functional requirement coverage are likely good candidates for assessing the quality of a TS, and execution time is one realistic measure of cost.
The authors use branch coverage information and the results showed that, for code-based test suites, Manhattan distance is more effective than Jaccard (2012).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com