Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
In 2005 2006, there were 2,050 individuals aged ≥20 years without diagnosed diabetes based on interview who were examined in the morning and asked to fast overnight.
Similar(59)
Patients were refrained from taking caffeine-containing substances for at least 24 h and were asked to fast at least 6 h prior to the PET studies; medications that may interfere with the cardiac pharmacological stress agent (e.g., nitrates or beta-blockers) were suspended for ≥24 h.
The subjects were told to avoid foods high in nitrate for 3 days before blood samples were taken, and were asked to fast overnight before sampling blood [ 18].
They refrained from taking caffeine-containing substances for at least 24 h and were asked to fast at least 6 h prior to the PET studies.
Subjects were asked to refrain from moderate- or high-intensity physical activities for 24 hours prior to testing, and were also asked to fast for 12 hours and sleep for at least 8 hours the night before testing.
Participant assessments were conducted across two 4 h visits approximately 1 week apart and participants were asked to fast for 12 h prior to each visit [ 26].
At each clinical phase, venous blood samples were taken from individuals who were fasting ≥8 h (those whose clinic visit was in the afternoon had a light fat-free breakfast and they were asked to fast for ≥5 h) before undergoing a standard 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (1).
To standardize influence of glucose and insulin levels on sensory assessments, all diabetic patients and healthy volunteers were asked to fast for 6 h (15).
Blood glucose levels have an impact on FDG uptake through (a) competitive displacement of FDG by plasma glucose, and (b) patients being asked to fast for 6 h prior to imaging.
The participants were asked to fast and arrive before breakfast to undergo blood sampling and a thorough clinical examination.
All subjects were asked to fast and to present to the survey center between 7.30 9.30 a.m.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com