Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Papers were read independently and appraised using a standardised checklist by two researchers, with differences being resolved by consensus [ J Epidemiol Community Health, 52 377 384, 1998].
Two hundred and twenty five articles published in the press from 2000 to 2007 and 78 documents targeted to women were extracted from available sources (publisher's archives or search engines in internet) and appraised using a standardized form dealing with graphic layout, editing, transparency of information, contents related to menopause and HRT.
Similar(58)
All studies were reviewed and critically appraised using a structured template.
Research reports were classified as grey literature and were appraised using a checklist developed for this purpose [ 21].
The quality of the 24 studies was appraised using a scale adapted from the 'Newcastle/Ottawa Scale (NOS)' 33 (the appraisal standard of NOS is shown in online supplementary appendix A).
The methodological quality of these articles was appraised using a standard tool.
4. Studies selected for inclusion in the review were critically appraised using a critical interpretive synthesis (Dixon-Woods et al., 2006).
All included studies were critically appraised using a standardised checklist.
Qualitative studies were appraised using a quality checklist (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009).
These papers were quality appraised using a modified Crombie tool.
Study quality was appraised using a modified BMJ checklist for economic evaluations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com