The rope anchorage is achieved by embedding it in the foundation and top tie-beams.
Optimal screw anchorage is achieved by involving the cis- and trans-cortex, as well as the medial and lateral pedicle wall.
In the Kuroda et al. [10] study, 3.3° mandibular counterclockwise rotation was achieved using temporary anchorage devices compared with the orthognathic surgery.
The metaphyseal anchorage of the humeral implant used in this study was achieved using a specially designed fixation device with six fins coated with hydroxyapatite of different sizes.
In this case, the movement of the lateral incisor was achieved in a short period of time by using only one adjacent tooth as anchor because the anchorage for the implant was already in place.
We speculate that in these cells either CTSL regulation is not lamin-dependent or that 53BP1 nuclear anchorage or activation is achieved through other mechanisms.
Although many attempts have been made to avoid lower incisor proclination, e.g., with the use of cast mandibular appliances, archwires with torque bends, or brackets with selective torques, absolute anchorage control has not yet been achieved and loss of mandibular anchorage can be anticipated[27, 28].
On the other hand, in the two-step/conventional anchorage group, the space closure is achieved by the simultaneous mesial movement of the posterior teeth and the distal movement of the anterior teeth.
Moreover, there have been no in vivo studies showing that an implant-bone anchorage of 80 mm can be achieved on a routine clinical basis and that this fixation length is necessary for implant stability and satisfying clinical results.
In uncemented implants, this is achieved by firm anchorage of the implant at surgery, by subsequent osseointegration, and from optimal bone stock at the peri-implant trabecular bone (Bauer and Schils 1999).
