Sentence examples for anchor for assessing from inspiring English sources
In our study we used the scores for perceived change in ability to perform daily activities as external criterion (anchor) for assessing responsiveness.
Therefore this is not the most appropriate anchor to use for assessing the MID of vision-specific functioning and HRQL as measured by the VFQ-25.
Using a DSC based method for assessing the anchoring stability of alkylated compounds in liposomes, it was demonstrated that the MTX-analogue partitioned into the water phase and thereby became available for cell uptake.
Furthermore, some Authors report that for assessing the MID anchor-based methods are preferred, as they include a definition of what is minimally important [ 12].
For assessing minimally important changes, anchor-based methods are preferred, as they include a definition of what is minimally important.
Dr PIAS[ 7, 8] is a web-based service for assessing the druggability of PPIs, and ANCHOR[ 9] identifies key "anchor" residues at interacting protein surfaces.
The rodent uterotrophic assay, a standard method for assessing a compound's estrogenicity, offers a model for phenotypic anchoring, or linking changes in gene expression to specific pathologic changes.
The associated national resource inventories [62] provide information invaluable for assessing regionally-specific ecosystem responses to natural and human disturbances and for anchoring regional-scale estimates of land use related carbon sources and sinks.
Broadly speaking, there are two main approaches for assessing the responsiveness of an outcome measure, most commonly referred to as anchor-based and distribution-based [ 17].
The associated national resource inventories [ 62] provide information invaluable for assessing regionally-specific ecosystem responses to natural and human disturbances and for anchoring regional-scale estimates of land use related carbon sources and sinks.
Items 5 8 were used for assessing the willingness to engage in the stated behaviour and rated on a 5-point scale anchored at 1 = totally disagree and 5 = totally agree.
