Analyzing the results of Table 4, the update time using the quiescent approach ranges from 583 ms to 737 ms, while our approach produces fairly stable update times (ranging from 25.72 ms to 27.30 ms).
Analyzing the results of the previous table and the Figs. 2, 3, 5 and 6 it is not difficult to recognize the different approach of each indicator, such as for example the core-periphery and border patterns of the location index and of the potential accessibility.
When analyzing the values of MOS given in Table 5, it is clearly seen that the quality of all reconstructed ECG signals is acceptable also at the CR of 20 1.
Table 1 Studies analyzing the role of cash flow sensitivity to investment around the globe Author Segmenting variables Methodology Findings Fazzari et al. (1988) Dividend pay-out Ordinary least square regression Cash flow sensitivity is significant for low pay-out firms and insignificant for high pay-out firms.
With the data resulting from these experiments, we employed five methods to verify the usefulness of the NSF45K array (Table 1), including analyzing the sources of variation, GO-term enrichment in lists of light- and dark-induced genes, and comparing the data with rice EST and other microarray data.
By analyzing the matrix of inter-item correlations (Table 1), a positive correlation between all items was found.
By analyzing the matrix of inter-item correlations (Table 3), a positive correlation between all items was found, ranging from 0.23 (the relationship between "breath stale" and "unable to work") to 0.81 (the relationship between "speech unclear" and "others misunderstood").
Analyzing the experimental data of Air table using a Design Software version 8 (Design Expert), regression Eqs.
Analyzing the data in Table 2 of the 166 'returning' professionals using multiple linear regression, we came to a conclusion that the total IF of papers published abroad was related to the duration of studying or training abroad (P < 0.01) and not to the age at which the subjects went abroad (P > 0.05).
In 25% of the discussions analyzed, individual tables of students did not improve after discussion; in some cases, the percent correct on the revote remained the same, while in other cases, more students selected the incorrect answer than during the individual vote.
