I've had some great bio-computational minds and leading-edge companies analyze my data and attempt to predict my health future.
The branch used to answer my research question and analyze my data is engagement, which looks at how individuals express their attitudes and ideas through various linguistic forms.
You speak in acronyms, take data, and analyze my son's behaviors.
Conceived the study: AK, DG, HM; Designed the experiments: MY, DG, AK; Performed the experiments:MY; Analyzed the data: MY, AK; Contributed reagents/materials: AK, SB, HM; Wrote the paper: MY, AK Read, contributed to and approved the paper: MY, HM, SB, DG, AK.
In my experience analyzing the data on what nearly 200,000 direct reports said about their bosses, the answer is unequivocally no.
If I spend my time analyzing these data, only to have it published under a "group project name" (similar to Sir William Timothy Gowers Polymathh project ), do I put it on my CV?
I started my career analyzing data and modeling plasma transport and chemistry in planetary magnetospheres.
I spend my days analyzing data for the Guardian and helping run our social media accounts, so I'm used to digging into numbers and figuring out what gets people going.
The training I've received from Teach Plus has made me more effective at collecting and analyzing data that drives my instruction.
MY and DC designed research; MY, DC and VL performed the experiments; DC, VL and KY contributed new reagents-analytic tools; MY, DC and HN analyzed and interpreted data; MY and DC wrote the manuscript.
